Movie time!

 

Albert Einstein developed his theory of special relativity in 1905, and then mentally mapped out his theory of general relativity between 1907 and 1915. For years to come, the rest of the world would try to catch up with Einstein, trying to understand the gist, let alone the full implications, of his groundbreaking ideas.

Above, you can watch one such attempt. Produced by Max and David Fleischer, best known for their Betty Boop and Superman cartoons, The Einstein Theory of Relativity used the power of animation to explain relativity to a broad, non-scientific audience in 1923.

 

Sunday’s Sermon

English: Stephen Hawking giving a lecture for ...

English: Stephen Hawking giving a lecture for NASA’s 50th anniversary (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

In the weeks before he died, Stephen Hawking wrote what would be his final theory of the cosmos. Co-written with Belgian physicist Thomas Hertog, and now published in the Journal of High Energy Physics“A smooth exit from eternal inflation?”asserts that “reality may be made up of multiple universes, but each one may not be so different to our own.” Or so that’s how the theory gets translated into colloquial English by The GuardianYou can read an abstract of the theory here, or the complete published version here.

Review: Chance in Evolution

The Tree of life image that appeared in Darwin...

The Tree of life image that appeared in Darwin’s On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection, 1859. This is the only figure in On the Origin of Species., Darwin used this Tree of Life (TOL) as a model for the theory of evolution. Uploaded from http://www.physorg.com/news92912140.html (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


Ever since the eminent astronomer Sir John Herschel over a century-and-a-half ago dismissed Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection as “the law of higglety-pigglety,” the role of chance in Darwin’s theory and in evolution itself has been controversial. Arguably even more than natural selection, it is the chance element in Darwin’s theory that distinguishes it from previous evolutionary theories and that leads a substantial percentage of Americans to reject it. It also turns out to be an especially vexed conceptual issue for biologists and philosophers trying to understand the processes and products of evolution. But what, precisely, is “chance” within the context of evolutionary biology, and what forms does it take in evolutionary processes?

This book brings together twelve essays by historians, philosophers, biologists, and a theologian to address such questions. Following an introduction by the editors explaining the significance of the book’s topic and highlighting its contents, the book consists of three parts, dealing with: 1. the historical development and religious and philosophical implications of chance in evolution; 2. chance in the processes of evolution; and 3. contingency in the history of life. These broad topics provide a loose thematic unity to each part of the book while leaving plenty of opportunity for essays to span historical, conceptual, and empirical issues. Following a summary of each of the volume’s essays I’ll conclude with some general remarks about the scope and quality of the book as a whole and the extent to which it achieves its editors’ stated goals.

 

 

Read the review.

 

Sunday’s Science Lecture

Science Salons

Two-dimensional representation of gravitationa...

Two-dimensional representation of gravitational waves generated by two neutron stars surrounding each other. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Happy Birthday, Darwin!

TVOL

As we celebrate Charles Darwin’s 207th, This View of Life publishes your thoughts on the single most important takeaway from the theory of evolution. You let us know that evolution is more than the biological mechanism by which species change over generations — it’s also responsible for changes in our culture, politics, economy, and religion. 

In this special issue, you’ll also find new essays: Educator of the Year Jason Niedermeyer shares with us how he teaches evolution to students who hate it before they know it. Cognitive scientist Andrew Shtulman explores the best way to draw the tree of life. David Sloan Wilson and Michael Price take on the “huh?” factor of Trump’s candidacy; and Dustin Eirdosh delves into Darwin’s mind to see how he saw.

We hope you enjoy this special issue and wish you an intellectually curious Darwin Day! 

— TVOL staff 

Sunday’s Sermon

NY_1946

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

As Japan marks the 70th anniversary of the atomic bombings by the United States, it’s well worth returning to the seminal article that laid the horrors of nuclear warfare before the world. John Hersey’s meticulous recreation of the moment the bomb hit Hiroshima, and his intertwined tales of victims,survivors and a shaken country, holds up 69 years after it was published.

Read it here.